Inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de las ciencias experimentales: herramientas, impactos y tendencias globales
Resumen
La inteligencia artificial (IA) transforma la enseñanza de ciencias experimentales en educación secundaria mediante la optimización de recursos, personalización del aprendizaje, evaluación estudiantil e integración de tecnologías como realidad virtual/aumentada. Este estudio realizó una revisión sistemática bajo el modelo de Newman y Gough y las directrices PRISMA, analizando la producción científica sobre IA en esta área. Se exploraron cinco preguntas: herramientas IA más usadas, objetivos, asignaturas, países con mayor investigación y resultados obtenidos. La búsqueda en Scopus, ERIC y WoS identificó 174 artículos, seleccionando 28 que cumplían criterios de inclusión. Los hallazgos destacan a ChatGPT como la herramienta más empleada, la Física como asignatura predominante y Estados Unidos como líder en investigaciones. Las herramientas IA se aplicaron con diversos fines pedagógicos, logrando resultados positivos en la mayoría de los casos, lo que evidencia su potencial para enriquecer y modernizar la enseñanza de las ciencias experimentales.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Araújo, J. L., y Saúde, I. (2024). Can ChatGPT Enhance Chemistry Laboratory Teaching? Using Prompt Engineering to Enable AI in Generating Laboratory Activities. Journal Of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1858-1864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00745
Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
Burke, M. D., Denmark, S. E., Diao, Y., Han, J., Switzky, R., & Zhao, H. (2024). Molecule Maker Lab Institute: Accelerating, advancing, and democratizing molecular innovation. ˜The œAI Magazine/AI Magazine, 45(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12154
De Souza, M. G., Won, M., Treagust, D., & Serrano, A. (2024). Visualising relativity: assessing high school students’ understanding of complex physics concepts through AI-generated images. Physics Education, 59(2), 025018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1e71
Derlina, Aisyah, Nurdin Bukit, Sahyar, y Ahdi Hassan. (2020). Blended Learning in English and English-medium Physics Classes Using Augmented Reality, Edmodo, and Tinkercad Media. TESOL International Journal, 15(3), 111-133. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/40916/
Diego Olite, F., Morales Suárez, I. y Vidal Ledo, M. J. (2023). Chat GPT: origen, evolución, retos e impactos en la educación. Educación Médica Superior, 37(2), e3876. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412023000200016&lng=es&tlng=es
Fernández-Miranda, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in Latin American universities: Emerging challenges. Computación y Sistemas. https://www.cys.cic.ipn.mx/ojs/index.php/CyS/article/view/4822
Forbus, K. D., Chang, M., McLure, M. D., y Usher, M. (2017b). The Cognitive Science of Sketch Worksheets. Topics In Cognitive Science, 9(4), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12262
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2024). Inteligencia artificial generativa y educación: Un análisis desde múltiples perspectivas. Education in the Knowledge Society, 25(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31942
Gregorčič, T., y Torkar, G. (2022). Using the structure-behavior-function model in conjunction with augmented reality helps students understand the complexity of the circulatory system. Advances In Physiology Education, 46(3), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00015.2022
Heeg, D. y Avraamidou, L. (2023) The use of Artificial intelligence in school science: a systematic literature review. Educational Media International, 60(2), 125-150. DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2023.2264990
Hernández-Ramos, J., Rodríguez-Becerra, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., y Aksela, M. (2023). Constructing a Novel E-Learning Course, Educational Computational Chemistry through Instructional Design Approach in the TPASK Framework. Education Sciences, 13(7), 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070648
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Baker, R.S., Inventado, P.S. (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. In: Larusson, J., White, B. (eds) Learning Analytics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
Ingkavara, T., Panjaburee, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Sajjapanroj, S. (2022). The use of a personalized learning approach to implementing self-regulated online learning. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100086
Jiang, S., McClure, J., Mao, H., Chen, J., Liu, Y., y Zhang, Y. (2023). Integrating Machine Learning and Color Chemistry: Developing a High-School Curriculum toward Real-World Problem-Solving. Journal Of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00589
Kaplan, A., y Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Katz, S., Albacete, P. L., Chounta, I., Jordan, P. W., McLaren, B. M., y Zapata‐Rivera, D. (2021). Linking Dialogue with Student Modelling to Create an Adaptive Tutoring System for Conceptual Physics. International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence In Education, 31(3), 397-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00226-y
Kim, S., Jeon, I., & Kang, S. (2024). Integrating Data Science and Machine Learning to Chemistry Education: Predicting Classification and Boiling Point of Compounds. Journal Of Chemical Education, 101(4), 1771-1776. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01040
Küchemann, S., Steinert, S., Revenga, N., Schweinberger, M., Dinc, Y., Avila, K. E., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT support prospective teachers in physics task development? Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020128
Lee, J. Y., Lee, G., y Hong, H. (2023). Automated Assessment of Student Hand Drawings in Free-Response Items on the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal Of Science Education And Technology, 32(4), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10042-3
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., y Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Manikandan, S., y Chinnadurai, M. (2020). Evaluation of Students’ Performance in Educational Sciences and Prediction of Future Development using TensorFlow. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 36(6), 1783-1790. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345131484
Martínez-Comesaña, M., Rigueira-Díaz, X., Larrañaga-Janeiro, A., Martínez, J. M., Ocarranza-Prado, I., y Kreibel, D. (2023b). Impact of artificial intelligence on assessment methods in primary and secondary education: Systematic literature review. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 28(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2023.06.002
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Ronghuai, H., & Zhang H. (2021). AI end education: Guidance for policy-makers (UNESCO), 45. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
Mokshin, А. В., Mokshin, V., & Mirziyarova, D. A. (2020). Formation of Regression Model for Analysis of Complex Systems Using Methodology of Genetic Algorithms. Nonlinear Phenomena In Complex Systems, 23(3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.33581/1561-4085-2020-23-3-317-326
Nasri, N. M., Nasri, N., Nasri, N. F., y Talib, M. A. A. (2023). The Impact of Integrating an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) on Secondary School Physics Students’ Scientific Inquiry Skills. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies, 16(2), 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2023.3241058
Nguyen, H. (2022). Let’s teach Kibot: Discovering discussion patterns between student groups and two conversational agent designs. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1864-1884. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13219
Newman, M., Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In: Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K. (eds) Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
Nurhasanah, Z., Widodo, A., Riandi, R. (2019). Augmented reality to facilitate students’ biology mastering concepts and digital literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 481-488. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.9694
Oh, P., y Seongjoo, K. (2021). Integrating Artificial Intelligence to Chemistry Experiment: Carbon Dioxide Fountain. Journal Of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2376-2380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00004
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021 : Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Oskotsky, T., Bajaj, R., Burchard, J., Cavazos, T. B., Chen, I., Connell, W., Eaneff, S., Grant, T., Kanungo, I., Lindquist, K., Myers-Turnbull, D., Naing, Z. Z. C., Tang, A., Vora, B., Wang, J., Karim, I., Swadling, C., Yang, J. H., Cohort, A. S., . . . Sirota, M. (2022). Nurturing diversity and inclusion in AI in Biomedicine through a virtual summer program for high school students. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(1), e1009719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009719
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Alonso-Fernández, S. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española De Cardiología, 74(9), 790-799. https://10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
Polverini, G., y Gregorcic, B. (2024). Performance of ChatGPT on the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010109
Quintero, L. J. C., y Selwyn, N. (2018c). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
Rugh, M. S., Capraro, M. M., y Capraro, R. M. (2023). Improving Self-Efficacy with automatically generated interactive concept maps: DIME maps. Electronic Journal Of e-Learning, 21(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.3.2765
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., y Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Song, Y., Lei, S., Hao, T., Lan, Z., y Ding, Y. (2020). Automatic Classification of Semantic Content of Classroom Dialogue. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 496-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120968554
Stolzenberger, C., Frank, F., y Trefzger, T. (2022). Experiments for students with built-in theory: ‘PUMA: Spannungslabor’ – an augmented reality app for studying electricity. Physics Education, 57(4), 045024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac60ae
Talanquer, V. (2023). Interview with the Chatbot: How Does It Reason? Journal Of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2821-2824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00472
Xu, W., y Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal Of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Yağci, A., y Çevik, M. (2019). Prediction of academic achievements of vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses through artificial neural networks (comparison of Turkey and Malaysia). Education And Information Technologies, 24(5), 2741-2761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09885-4
Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024). The impact of AI in physics education: a comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. Physics Education, 59(2), 025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1fa2
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.54988/cv.2026.2.1698
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Campus Virtuales
ISSN: 2255-1514
www.revistacampusvirtuales.es
campusvirtuales@uajournals.com