Perception of students on blended learning considering data science and machine learning
Resumen
This quantitative research aims to analyze the impact of audiovisual contents, discussion forums and online evaluations in the Blended learning modality through data science and machine learning. The sample is composed of 106 students from the careers of Administration, Commerce, Accounting, Marketing and Systems. The results of machine learning (linear regression) indicate that audiovisual contents, discussion forums and online evaluations in the Blended learning modality positively influence the teaching-learning process. On the other hand, data science identified 3 predictive models on the use of Blended learning by means of the decision tree technique. This research recommends the incorporation of the Blended learning modality during the planning and organization of school courses in order to develop the competencies of the students. Finally, Blended learning represents an alternative to improve teaching-learning conditions in the 21st century through the performance of synchronous and asynchronous school activities.
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Al Samarraie, H.; Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77-91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016.
Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement courses. Computers & Education, 132, 31-43. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004.
Boelens, R.; Voet, M.; Wever, B. D. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197-212. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009.
Bower, M.; Lee, M. J.; Dalgarno, B. (2017). Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 407-430.
Cavanaugh, C.; Hargis, J.; Mayberry, J. (2016). Participation in the Virtual Environment of Blended College Courses: An Activity Study of Student Performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 263-275. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.1811.
Chang, C. C.; Shu, K. M.; Liang, C.; Tseng, J. S.; Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning as measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high school students?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 213-231. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1708.
Chiecher, A. C.; Melgar, M. F. (2018). Do they know everything? Educational innovations aimed at promoting digital skills in university students. Apertura, 10(2), 110-123.
Daungcharone, K.; Panjaburee, P.; Thongkoo, K. (2019). A mobile game-based C programming language learning: results of university students' achievement and motivations. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(2), 171-192.
Diep, A.; Zhu, C.; Struyven, K.; Blieck, Y. (2017). Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2) 473-489.
Ellis, R. A.; Bliuc, A. (2016). An exploration into first‐year university students approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970-980.
Ellis, R. A.; Pardo, A.; Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments -Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90-102. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006.
Esparaza Moguel, M. C.; Salinas Urbina, V.; Glasserman Morales, L. D. (2015). B-learning modality vs. face to face modality learning management in english grammar teaching. Apertura, 7(2), 1-10.
Han, F.; Ellis, R. A. (2019). Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 40(1), 12-19. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002.
Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L. (2019). Towards a framework for an institution-wide quantitative assessment of teachers' online participation in blended learning implementation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42(1), 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.03.003.
Harrison, J.; West, R. (2014). Sense of community in a blended technology integration course: A design-based research study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 290-312. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1907.
Henrie, C.; Bodily, R.; Manwaring, K.; Graham, C. (2015). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131-155. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015.
Hernández Gutiérrez, C.; Juárez Pacheco, M. (2018). Satisfaction of the students in a preparatory course of mathematics in e-modalities. Apertura, 10(2), 6-19. doi:10.32870/Ap.v10n2.1384.
Hilliard, L. P.; Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41(1), 11-24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002.
Hodges G. W.; Wang, L.; Lee, J.; Cohen, A.; Jang, Y. (2018). An exploratory study of blending the virtual world and the laboratory experience in secondary chemistry classrooms. Computers & Education, 122, 179-193. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.003.
Lukenchuk, A. (2016). Themes at the intersections of theory and practice in online and blended education. Distance Education, 37(1), 130-136. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1158771.
Lyons T.; Evans, M. M. (2013). Blended Learning to Increase Student Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(1), 43-53. doi:10.1080/10875301.2013.800626.
Niekerk, J. V.; Webb, P. (2016). The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning material in the teaching of programming logic. Computers & Education, 103, 16-27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.008.
Ocampo López, A.; Gómez Zermeño, M. G.; Zambrano Izquierdo, D. (2015). Teachers’ perception of blended learning courses to develop work Competencies. Apertura, 7(2), 1-12.
Pock, A. (2007). Strategic Management in Islamic Finance. Germany: Springer.
Prasad, P. W.; Maag, A.; Redestowicz, M.; Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92-103. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.016.
Pulham, E.; Graham, C. R. (2018). Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: a literature review. Distance Education, 39(3), 411-432. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1476840.
Salas Rueda, R. A. (2018). Analysis on the Use of Continuous Improvement, Technology and Flipped Classroom in the Teaching-Learning Process by means of Data Science. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(4), 325-343. doi:10.12973/ojcmt/3955.
Salas Rueda, R. A.; Salas Rueda, E. P.; Salas Rueda, R. D. (2019). Design and use of a web application for the field of statistics considering the assure model and data science. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 12(1), 1-24.
Salas Rueda, R. A.; Salas Rueda, E. P.; Salas Rueda, R. D.; Várgas Pérez, Y. M. (2019). Analysis of the Web Application for the Punctual Estimation by means of data science. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 6(2), 1-25.
Solorzano Garcia, M.; Navio Marco, J. (2019). Developing social entrepreneurs through distance education: the value of commitment and interactivity with the learning community. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(1), 30-50.
Thongkoo, K.; Panjaburee, P.; Daungcharone, K. (2019). A development of ubiquitous learning support system based on an enhanced inquiry-based learning approach. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(2), 129-151.
Vaughan, N.; Cloutier, D. (2017). Evaluating a blended degree program through the use of the NSSE framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1176-1187.
Wang, Q.; Huang, C. (2018). Pedagogical, social and technical designs of a blended synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 451-462.
Wang, Q.; Quek, C.; Hu, X. (2017). Designing and Improving a Blended Synchronous Learning Environment: An Educational Design Research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 99-118. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034.
Yamagata Lynch, L. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189-212. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Campus Virtuales
ISSN: 2255-1514
www.revistacampusvirtuales.es
campusvirtuales@uajournals.com