Trayectoria e influencia de la visión Indo-Pacífico de Estados Unidos de América

Pablo Rivas Pardo, Nicole Ayala Pulgar

Resumen


En mayo de 2018, el USPACOM se renombró como USINDOPACOM, creándose la visión Indo-Pacífico que se presenta como una competencia geopolítica de Estados Unidos de América en contra de China. En consecuencia, se analiza la trayectoria de la visión Indo-Pacífico de Estados Unidos de América y la influencia de tal visión en los Estados que conforman el SQUAD y el non-QUAD. El análisis enfocado a poder, paz, prosperidad y principios, arroja como resultado: que mientras la trayectoria de la visión Indo-Pacífico estadounidense es en contra de China, la influencia a los dos grupos de Estados no es tal cual lo promueve Estados Unidos de América, ya que confronta menos o no se confronta a China y el contenido es dispar o simplemente no se considera.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Australian Government Department of Defence. (2013). Defence White Paper. (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1516/DefendAust/2013).

Australian Government Department of Defence. (2016). Defence White Paper. (https://www.defence.gov.au/about/publications/2016-defence-white-paper).

----“Managing strategic risk” (pp. 32-35).

----“A stable Indo-Pacific region and a rules-based global order” (p. 70).

----“South Asia” (p. 134).

Australian Government. (2017). Foreign Policy White Paper, 2017. (https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-white-paper.pdf).

----"Power shifts in the Indo-Pacific” (p. 25).

----“Chapter three: A stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific” (pp. 37-47).

Beazley, K. (2012). Australia in the Indo-Pacific Century. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 28(3), 50-52.

Bisley, N.; Phillips, A. (2012). The Indo-Pacific: What Does It Actually Mean?. East Asia Forum. (https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/10/06/the-indo-pacific-what-does-it-actually-mean/).

Clinton, H. (2011). America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy, (189), 56-63.

Defence Ministry of The Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Defence White Paper. (https://www.loc.gov/item/2018333274/).

Doyle, T.; Rumley, D. (2020). The Rise and Return of the Indo-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

----“Introduction: Constructions of the Indo-Pacific Region” (pp. 01-11).

----“Maritime Regional Theories Oceans and Seas” (pp. 12-27).

European Commision. (2021). European Union Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. (https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu-indo-pacific_factsheet_2022-02_0.pdf).

Gnanagurunathan, G. (2012). India and the Idea of the ‘Indo-Pacific’. East Asia Forum. (https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/10/20/india-and-the-idea-of-the-indo-pacific/).

Heydarian, R. (2020). The new cartography of power. The Indo-Pacifc: Trump, China, and the New Struggle for Global Mastery, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 01-19).

Jentleson, B. (2014). The National Interest: The “4 Ps” Framework. American Foreign Policy. United States of America: Norton (pp. 08-17).

Jung, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, J. (2021). The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 53-68. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1766909.

Latamont, C. (2015). Qualitative Methods in International Relations. Research Methods in International Relations, Reino Unido: SAGE (pp. 77-95).

Li, H. (2021). The ‘Indo-Pacific’: Intellectual Origins and International Visions in Global Contexts. Modern Intellectual History (pp. 1-27). doi:10.1017/S1479244321000214.

Medcalf, R. (2012). Pivoting the Map: Australia’s Indo-Pacific System. The Centre of Gravity Series Paper Nº1. ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre.

Ministry of External Affairs India. (2022). Annual Report 2021-22. (https://www.mea.gov.in/annual-reports.htm?57/Annual_Reports).

----“Indo-Pacific” (pp. 172-176).

Ministry of Defence India. (2019). Annual Report 2018-2019. (https://www.mod.gov.in/dod/annual-reports).

----“Security Environment” (pp. 1-8).

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Japan. (2021). Diplomatic Bluebook. (https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/2021/en_html/index.html).

----“Promotion of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP)” (pp. 30-34).

Ministry of Defense Japan. (2021). Defense of Japan. (https://www.mod.go.jp/en/publ/w_paper/wp2021/DOJ2021_Digest_EN.pdf).

----“Defense Chronology” (pp. 1-6).

Ministry of National Defence Vietnam. (2019). Vietnam National Defence. (http://www.mod.gov.vn/wps/wcm/connect/08963129-c9cf-4c86-9b5c-81a9e2b14455/2019VietnamNationalDefence.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=08963129-c9cf-4c86-9b5c-81a9e2b14455#:~:text=2.,attaché%20offices%20in%20Viet%20Nam).

----“International Integration and Defence Diplomacy” (pp. 26-29).

Mohan, R. (2012). Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Pan, C. (2014). The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China's rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 453-469. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.884054.

The State Council (of the People’s Republic of China). (2019). China's National Defense in the New Era. (https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html).

The White House. (2017). National Security Strategy. (https://history.defense.gov/Historical-Sources/National-Security-Strategy/).

----“Pilar III. Preserve Peace through Strength” (pp. 25-36).

----“The Strategy in a Regional Context” (pp. 45-47).

The White House. (2018). National Defense Strategy. (https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf).

----“Strategic Environment” (pp. 2-3).

----“Build a More Lethal Force” (pp. 5-8).

----“Strengthen Alliances and Attract New Partners” (pp. 8-10).

The White House. (2021). National Security Strategy. (https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf).

----“Our National Security Priorities” (pp. 9-22).

The White House. (2022). Indo-Pacific Strategy. (https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf).

----“Our Indo-Pacific Strategy” (p. 7).

----“Bolster Indo-Pacific Security” (pp. 12-13).

Republic of Korea, Ministry of National Defense. (2018). Defense White Paper. (https://www.myget.org/feed/ulummg/package/nuget/2018-Defense-White-Paper-Ministry-of-National-Defense-Republic-of-Korea-download-rk).

----“Section 2 Security Environment of Northeast Asia” (pp. 12-21).

U. S. Department of the Navy. (2015). A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. (https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/navy/21st-century-seapower_strategy_201503.pdf).

----“Indo-Asia-Pacific” (pp. 11-13).

U.S. Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. (https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF).

---- “Vision and Principles for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific” (pp. 3-6).

---- “The People´s Republic of China as Revisionist Power” (pp. 7-10).

---- “Line of Effort 2: partnerships” (pp. 21-44).

---- “Line of Effort 3: Promoting a Networked Region” (pp. 44-51).

---- “Maritime Security Initiative: year four” (p. 49).

U.S. Department of State. (2019). A free and open Indo-Pacific. (https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf).

----“Ensuring Peace and Security” (pp. 22-24).

----“Protect the maritime domain” (p. 23).

U.S. Department of Defense. (2022). National Defense Strategy (fact sheet). (https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964702/-1/-1/1/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF).

----“Priorities” (p. 1).

USINDOPACOM. (2022). History of United States Indo-Pacific Command. (https://www.pacom.mil/About-USINDOPACOM/History/).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.54988/cisde.2024.1.1306

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista de Pensamiento Estratégico y Seguridad CISDE

ISSN: 2529-8763

www.uajournals.com/cisdejournal

cisdejournal@uajournals.com